Results – of Ética a Nicómaco: Traducción de Pedro Simón Abril (Spanish Edition) by Aristóteles and a Published by EDITORIAL GREDOS S.A. Ética a Nicómaco by Aristóteles and a great selection of similar Used, New and Collectible Books available now Published by Editorial Gredos, Madrid (). Results 1 – 30 of 75 ETICA A NICOMACO by ARISTÓTELES (Estagira, Macedonia a. de J.C. ) and a Published by Editorial Gredos, Madrid ().
|Published (Last):||10 May 2015|
|PDF File Size:||12.23 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.3 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This allows the mutual questioning of prejudices that are constitutively linked to any act of understanding, and in some cases can distort that understanding. Libro VI, 13, b However, this approach is not especially practical. Libro I, 6, b This should be further qualified.
In general, it must be said that every reading must contain an application Hermeneutics does not provide a method, but an awareness of our mediated ability to reach the truth. It is true, as Svenaeus says, that Gadamer does not consider the goal of hermeneutic understanding the timeless truths that can be attained through a universal and timeless method.
But if we have not attained virtue, knowledge does not profit. In his view, the aim of all understanding and of any consensus etoca on it is agreement on the thing itself.
For Gadamer, training is, together with the sensus communisthe capacity for judgment and taste, one of the four basic elements of humanism. That practical reasoning finds support in the basic nicomaaco goods that guide it does not mean that it provides absolutely objective knowledge.
Commenting on Gadamer, Grondin points out that a distinctive feature of humanism is not to produce measurable results, but rather to contribute to training The question of dialogue According to Gadamer, what the tool of method does not achieve must — and really can — be achieved by a discipline of asking and inquiring, a discipline that guarantees the truth The problem comes with difficult cases.
The present work analyzes the contribution of the hermeneutical approach to clinical ethics, particularly in relation to decision making in the field.
Εθνικό Κέντρο Βιβλίου / Αρχείο μεταφρασμένων ελληνικών βιβλίων
This theory takes into consideration four parameters 7: Nature and natural law in contemporary philosophical and theological debates: If this is not in fact so, it is not because, in the Hobbesian manner, discord is replaced by concord and war by peace, but because each and every one of these perspectives may also be mistaken with respect to reality, or biased by prejudices.
Have stated that dialogue serves to reveal the particularities of our prior judgments and, through it, allows us to obtain a greater degree of understanding 8. That is why Gadamer affirms: He proposes, furthermore, that dialogue allows us to become aware of the inevitable prejudices that accompany understanding.
Therefore, one cannot understand another if one does not understand the world. The hermeneutical approach helps us to understand how we form a clinical and ethical judgment, but it does not tell us which treatment is good from a clinical standpoint, nor does it guide us about what treatment or the absence of treatment is good from an ethical point of view. Services on Demand Journal.
In short, tradition conditions understanding, but, in turn, understanding conditions tradition. One wonders whether it is necessary to presuppose this truth, editorisl, in another case, it may not be clear what sense dialogue will have. Toward a hermeneutical bioethics.
Ferment in US bioethics. Precisely because of this, Aristotle stresses the importance of knowledge for the prudent. That the humanities or the sciences of the spirit are moral sciences seems to determine the progressive enrichment of training that is part of a progressive refinement of prudence. I find myself part of a history and that is generally to say, whether I like it or not, whether I recognize it or not, that I am one of the bearers of a tradition The aforementioned hermeneutic perspectives do not have at their disposal the tool of method, but the tool of dialogue, which occupies a central place in sditorial such approaches.
Libro II, 4, b And the humanities are essential for training. That is why he states: Finally, the hicomaco that all interpretation is tentative, and that more than one meaning is always possible, should nocomaco be overlooked. In understanding, one does not only dialogue with a text — or a patient — but also with tradition. This statement falls short, however, and reduces the Gadamerian approach. It is not them, but the subjects themselves, that nicomado agreement.
It is to begin agreement. In a radical sense, why approach what is distant?
As Garcia Llerena has pointed out, the only way to escape relativism — and also its opposite, absolutism — is to turn to an objective and transcultural referent: This end is healing. This rejection of an applied ethics ecitorial a general feature of all hermeneutic approaches to clinical ethics.
For these authors, it is important to note that the doctor shares with the patient a mortal body, which is also vulnerable. It is not that I impose myself, or that another imposes himself, as in a relationship of power. But it overlooks the nivomaco that dialogue, according to Gadamer, is directed towards truth. Hermeneutics of clinical practice: This has nothing to do with traditionalism, since traditions are a living stream, in constant transformation.